Indian Malt Whisky Association – a new era of Indian single malts

India drinks more whisky than anyone else in the world. That’s a fact. But did anyone in Glasgow or Edinburgh take this seriously even fifteen years ago? Hardly. The problem was that most of what Indians called whisky was made from molasses—cheap, strong spirits that in Europe and America were simply called rum, or something even worse. When Amrut appeared behind the bar of a Scottish pub in 2004 as the first Indian single malt, the reactions were mixed. There was curiosity, but also plenty of skepticism.

Indian Malt Whisky Association – why was it established now?

The journey from cheap alcohol to genuine single malt was far from easy. For decades, India built its reputation as a consumer market, not a creator. Only the successes of Amrut, followed by Paul John and more recently Indri, proved that whisky from this region can stand alongside Scotch or Japanese varieties. The problem? Each of these brands operated independently. There was no unified voice saying, “We are India, and we’re here for real.” This need led to the registration of the organization in 2024, with the official launch taking place in March 2025.

IMWA – Indian Malt Whisky Association – is essentially the answer to the question of how to change the perception of an entire country in the context of whisky. Simply put: an association of the largest malt whisky producers, aiming to secure India a seat at the table alongside players like Scotland, Ireland, and Japan. Not as an exotic addition, but as an equal partner.

What made India want its own equivalent of the Scotch Whisky Association? It was a combination of several factors:

• The global acclaim of the first single malts proved that there’s more to achieve than just molasses.
• The lack of common standards undermined the credibility of the entire segment.
• Without a unified message, marketing was chaotic and ineffective.

The establishment of IMWA is groundbreaking not because something suddenly changed in the recipes or barrels. Rather, it’s about India no longer waiting for external recognition and taking matters into its own hands. Now, it can be said: there is an institution that defines, protects, and promotes Indian single malt as a distinct and valuable category.

In the next section, we’ll explore the detailed history of this journey—from the earliest attempts and key milestones to the specifics of how IMWA plans to make “Indian Single Malt” a recognized term around the world.

How IMWA was founded – the journey from molasses to regulation

If someone had mentioned Indian whisky in the 1990s, most Europeans would probably have raised an eyebrow. And with good reason—what was sold in bottles labeled “whisky” in Delhi or Mumbai often had little in common with what was considered the real spirit in Scotland.

The era of molasses

Until around 2004, the Indian market looked like this: over 90 percent of “whisky” was made from sugarcane molasses, not grain. It was produced on a massive scale—quickly and cheaply—as the warm climate meant both distillation and aging happened much faster than in Europe. The problem? According to Scottish or Irish regulations, this kind of whisky wasn’t whisky at all. In the West, the rules required grain, a minimum barrel aging period, and strictly defined processes. In India, these standards simply didn’t apply for a long time. For local consumers, this wasn’t an issue, but it closed the door to export and prestige.

First single malt

Everything began to change one day in 2004 in Glasgow. Amrut presented its first single malt there—produced in Bangalore and matured entirely from malted barley. This was India’s first entry of its kind onto the international stage, and it must be said that the reactions surprised many. Western media suddenly wrote about a “new star from Asia.” Why all the buzz? Because it meant that India could do more than just cheap molasses-based blends—they could compete in terms of quality.

After this breakthrough, a real boom followed. Around 2010, more brands appeared—Paul John, Rampur, and later Indri, which has won several competitions. The domestic single malt market grew rapidly, also thanks to the expanding middle class looking for premium products.

From collaboration to IMWA

The more success Indian manufacturers achieved—awards, exports—the more glaring the lack of common standards became. Each company operated independently, with no unified definition or representation. Market pressure forced a change.

IMWA was founded by four pioneering companies who realized that without a unified organization, further development would be lopsided. Export required standards that would be recognized by the West—otherwise, the industry would remain confined to a local niche. All these years, from Glasgow to Gurgaon, have shown one thing: Indian whisky can be global, but it must speak with one voice.

What exactly does IMWA regulate – objectives, members, and quality standards

Most countries with a developed whisky market have their own industry associations — Scotland has the SWA, Ireland the IWA, and Japan the JSLMA. India has followed a similar path, but with its own unique context. In April 2024, the Indian Malt Whisky Association was established, aiming from the outset to adapt the experiences of other regions to the specifics of a tropical climate and a young tradition.

IMWA has defined Indian single malt quite precisely. First: 100% malted barley, with no addition of other grains (which is important, as the Indian market was dominated for years by blends with molasses). Second: distillation, maturation, and bottling must take place exclusively in India—no importing young spirits from abroad. Third: a minimum maturation period of 3 years in oak casks, although whisky ages much faster in the tropics than in Scotland. Fourth: a minimum bottling strength of 40% ABV. Fifth: if an age statement appears on the bottle, it refers to the youngest component in the blend, not the average.

Each of these points makes sense. The barley requirement excludes “Indian blends” made with neutral spirits. The distillation requirement in India strengthens the local brand. Three years is the international standard, but in the heat of Kerala or Karnataka, whisky loses more angel’s share—sometimes over 10% per year. The minimum strength threshold protects against dilution, and age statements build transparency.

IMWA lists several main objectives: defending the quality and reputation of Indian single malt, striving to obtain a geographical indication (GI), promoting the “Made in India” brand in export markets, and supporting consistent labeling standards. These are not empty slogans. Geographical indication will provide legal protection, just as Scotch or Irish whiskey have.

The founders are four companies: John Distilleries (Paul John brand), Amrut Distilleries (Amrut), Radico Khaitan (Rampur), and Piccadily Agro (Indri). In November 2025, Diageo India joined them. These entities produce over 90% of Indian single malt available abroad. Amrut is sold in 50 countries, Paul John in over 40. These are not random players.

A comparison with Scotland or Ireland reveals more similarities than differences. All three organizations strive for quality standards, protect geographical indications, and educate the market. The difference lies in the climate: the angel’s share in India reaches 12-15% per year, compared to 2% in Scotland. That’s why IMWA cannot simply copy British regulations—it has to adapt them.

IMWA also undertakes “soft” activities. Dialogue with regulators in India, educational campaigns, emphasizing responsible consumption—especially after Diageo joined, bringing its own social programs. These are not yet spectacular successes, but the foundation for them is in place.

Defined frameworks have a specific purpose – they set the boundaries of the product and the ambitions of the organization. In the next section, we’ll see how these frameworks impact the market and how much they are actually worth in practice.

IMWA on the global stage – significance, controversies, and possible scenarios

India is an interesting case. They consume half of all the whisky in the world—I read it’s about 50 percent—but for years, no one talked about it openly, because most of it was cheap alcohol, often not even real whisky by Western standards. Now, however, the Indian Malt Whisky Association wants to change that and make the world finally take notice of Indian single malts.

And it actually works. Indri—a brand that maybe only a handful of geeks had heard of two years ago—was named the best whisky in the world in 2023 at the Whiskies of the World Awards. Specifically. Sales skyrocketed by about 500 percent, surpassing 100,000 cases in two years. This isn’t some marginal shift; it’s a real change in the market. Amrut and Paul John had won awards before, but Indri is a breakthrough—suddenly, people in the industry started taking India seriously. And recently, Mansha also received a distinction in 2025, so you can see the pattern.

Now IMWA has applied for a Geographical Indication (GI) for “Indian Single Malt.” This is a form of legal protection—similar to what the Scots have for Scotch Whisky or the French for cognac. If it goes through (and I think it will, probably around 2026), no one will be able to call their product “Indian Single Malt” unless it meets the standards. It’s a way to fight counterfeits, but also a bargaining tool in international trade. India can say: we protect our category just as professionally as you do.

There’s a bit of a paradox here, because on one hand IMWA is building this global reputation—all members stick to the standards, so when you buy an Indian malt, you know what to expect. On the other hand, there are voices saying it’s a club for the big players. Smaller distilleries, which might not have the capital for certification or long-term aging, could be left out. Although from what I’ve seen, IMWA does accept smaller ones too—but can everyone really afford these procedures? I’m not sure.

There are different perspectives on what IMWA does:

• Enthusiasts and most members: say that the organization is finally unifying the industry, putting an end to chaos, and as a result, Indian whisky can now compete with Scotch or Japanese whisky on equal terms. Building global trust, clear standards.

• Critics (mainly local, some independent producers): see a risk of monopolization by a few large companies (Radico Khaitan, John Distilleries, Piccadilly), and fear that smaller regional brands will lose the opportunity to enter the market or be forced into costly adjustments.

• Western experts and bartenders: praise Indian malts for their innovative flavor profile—the tropical climate accelerates aging, so a 5-year-old malt from India can taste like a 10-year-old Scotch. Experimenting with cask finishes (wine or rum barrels) is also receiving positive reviews.

I think that within three to five years we will see a few things

How to Use Knowledge about IMWA – Conclusions for Connoisseurs and the Industry

For years, Indian whisky was a popularity contest for molasses-based products—cheaper, more accessible, but far removed from the craftsmanship of Scotch or Japanese spirits. The IMWA changed the game. By introducing unified standards and a clear definition of single malt, India has moved from being an exotic curiosity to a serious player on the global market. This isn’t just about the name—it’s a qualitative shift that brings order to the market and builds consumer trust.

Conclusions for the connoisseur

Someone who understands the role of the IMWA stops picking bottles at random. Now they know that the age statement on the label actually matters—it’s not just a marketing ploy, but a guarantee of minimum maturation. They can also tell the difference between a product made from molasses and a true single malt, and they’re aware that not every Indian whisky meets the same standards.

This opens the door to asking better questions. In a shop or bar, it’s worth inquiring about the origin of the grain, the type of casks used for aging, and the production time. A knowledgeable seller will have the answers—and if not, it might be a sign to look elsewhere. IMWA provides the tools to make sure you know exactly what you’re buying.

Tastings of Indian malts now have context. You can compare the tropical climate with the temperate one, observe how faster aging affects the flavor profile, and understand why some whiskies have a “denser” character than their Scottish counterparts. It’s not just pleasure in a glass—it’s a conscious choice based on knowledge.

Opportunities for the industry

For importers and distributors, the rising prestige of Indian single malts is a clear call to action. It’s worth expanding your portfolio with a few brands that meet IMWA standards—not necessarily all at once, but focusing on the most recognizable names or those with an interesting profile. Customers are starting to ask about these bottles, and not having them on the shelf could mean missed opportunities.

Bar and restaurant owners can educate their guests. Sharing a brief story about IMWA when serving a drink adds value—it’s suddenly not just “some whisky from India,” but a product governed by unified standards and worthy of attention. This kind of narrative sells itself.

Investors, on the other hand, can track market dynamics. Some are considering purchasing casks—while it’s still a niche, the growth potential is significant. Others are eyeing brands that are just starting to export and could increase in value over the coming years. Of course, there is always risk, but IMWA helps reduce chaos and provides a point of reference.

You might see IMWA as a dull legal or trade topic, but that would be a mistake. It’s actually part of a bigger story: how India is evolving from mass-produced cheap alcohol to sophisticated premium spirits, from imitation to originality. It’s worth testing for yourself, glass in hand, what’s really behind this shift—not relying on myths or marketing, but on a specific bottle with a label that meets the association’s standards. Because now, you know what to look for.

Tones

editorial investments & sport

Premium Journalist